Your dang ku is hanging out!
In a moment of brutal honesty, Susie Felber notes that she does not find crotch-less panties to be “sexy,” linking to an AP story, of which the above image is from, in an attempt to dissuade others of such a ridiculous concept in eroticism.
Let me dispel a myth apparently smuggled into Susie’s observation. We (and by that I mean men of the heterosexual persuasion) do not think crotch-less panties are sexy, either. Not even a little bit. All things being equal, we prefer underwear on our lady friends be at least partially crotch-encumbered.
For us, breached undies are more solution than titillating fashion. Think of the computer geek who leaves the top off his or her PC case: sure it looks strange, but at least it offers one ready access to the important equipment. It’s also the reason computers don’t come with bras.
You see, those who like crotch-less panties are not sick. They’re just being practical.
Author: Kaf Oseo
Categories: Ancient Guff
Comments: (2) · Leave a comment · Comments RSS2 · Trackback URL
Hmm, I always figured underwear was primarily for drip-catching and skid-mark control, so the idea of NOT covering the sources of such makes me wonder why one would even bother wearing something crotchless.
As for practicality, it’s easy enough to move panties aside.
Wait, is this a PG site?
All the way back to when I first learned girls wore underwear, too—though mainly since I started to find that interesting—I’ve been in agreement with that view. But then many of today’s computer case tops have only a couple twist screws, making their removal unbelievably simple. What can I say, people are lazy.
And the fucking day this fucking site goes fucking PG is the fucking day I fucking give it up.
[Big wave to my little niece and nephews!]